Biden Was Issued A Preliminary Injunction To Limit Government Censorship Of Online Speech To Regulate Social Media

Biden was ruled by a U.S. federal judge that the government’s policy of regulating social media may violate the Constitution’s “First Amendment”, so he issued a preliminary injunction order and restricted the government from censoring online speech. The move was described as a huge victory by Republicans who initiated the lawsuit.

This is a significant ruling that may have far-reaching implications for the First Amendment of the Constitution, destroying the federal government’s efforts to strengthen coordination with social platforms over the past few years to combat cybercrime and foreign interference in elections.

The Republican attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana accused the Biden administration last year of cracking down on online disinformation and fostering a sprawling federal scrutiny organization. Republicans described the ruling as a resistance to government scrutiny, while White House officials said the Justice Department is reviewing the injunction and will determine its next steps.

U.S. District Judge Doughty of Louisiana, appointed by former U.S. President Trump, issued a ruling that the government’s policy of regulating social media may violate the Constitution’s “First Amendment” because most of the censorship is aimed at Conservative rhetoric.

After the preliminary injunction was issued, several federal agencies including the FBI, the Department of Health and Human Services, and White House officials were immediately restricted from accessing social media companies.

Suppress or reduce the freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution through any means such as inducement and pressure. As for government officials, they are exempted for posts involving crimes and conspiracy theories, as well as for reasons of national security.

Based on previous rulings, many such actions have been dismissed by the courts. This is the first time a federal judge has succeeded in limiting the federal government’s censorship of online speech. This has far-reaching implications for the First Amendment of the Constitution and could intensify conservative attacks on online censorship.

[SOURCE]